Accessibility is woven throughout our design process rather than treated as a separate consideration. We ensure color contrast meets WCAG AA standards (at minimum), text can be resized without breaking layouts, keyboard navigation is fully supported, interactive elements have appropriate focus states, and images have meaningful alt text. When all cannot be achieved we employ a third-party tool called AccessiBe. This is an accessibility plug-in that adds all the needed (and legally required) features to your website for those that need it.
Testing & Iteration
No matter how thoughtful our design process, testing with real users is essential. Even the most experienced designers can’t predict every interaction, which is why UX in website design must include rigorous testing and refinement.
Usability testing involves watching real people use your website to complete specific tasks. We might ask them to find particular information, complete a purchase, fill out a contact form, or steer between related content. As they work, we observe points of confusion, hesitation, or frustration—all valuable indicators of UX issues that need addressing. These sessions often reveal surprising insights. One Pleasant Ridge business owner was shocked to find that users consistently overlooked a key feature on their homepage. “It was right there,” they said, “but the way we designed it made it virtually invisible to users.”
A/B testing takes a data‑driven approach by comparing two versions of a page to see which performs better. We might test different call‑to‑action buttons, headlines, form layouts, images, or navigation structures. The results remove guesswork from design decisions. Even small changes can have significant impacts—one client saw a 32% increase in form completions simply by changing a button from “Submit” to “Get Started.”
Accessibility audits ensure your website works for everyone, including people with disabilities. These comprehensive checks identify barriers like insufficient color contrast, missing alt text for images, keyboard navigation problems, form labels not properly associated with inputs, or complex interactions without adequate instructions. Addressing these issues not only serves users with disabilities but often improves the experience for everyone.
Core Web Vitals measure aspects of user experience related to loading, interactivity, and visual stability. These Google‑defined metrics—Largest Contentful Paint (loading performance), First Input Delay (interactivity), and Cumulative Layout Shift (visual stability)—directly impact both user experience and search engine rankings, making them crucial considerations in website optimization.
We use a variety of tools to facilitate different aspects of UX testing, including Hotjar for heatmaps (we used to use but Microsoft Clarity is Free)and session recordings, Crazy Egg for click tracking, UserTesting for remote usability sessions, Optimizely for A/B testing, WAVE for accessibility evaluation, and Google PageSpeed Insights for performance measurement. The key is selecting the right tools for your specific testing needs and budget.
Measuring UX Success
How do you know if your UX in website design efforts are actually paying off? Measurement is essential not only for demonstrating value but also for guiding ongoing improvements.
Task success rate is a fundamental metric that measures the percentage of tasks users complete successfully. If only 60% of visitors can add a product to their cart, that’s a clear indication of a UX issue in the purchase flow. By tracking these rates over time, we can see how improvements impact real user success.
Net Promoter Score (NPS) measures customer loyalty by asking how likely users are to recommend your website or product to others. Scores range from -100 to +100, with higher scores indicating greater loyalty. Users scoring 9‑10 are Promoters (loyal enthusiasts), those scoring 7‑8 are Passives (satisfied but unenthusiastic), and those scoring 0‑6 are Detractors (unhappy customers). This single number provides a valuable snapshot of overall satisfaction.
Dwell time and engagement metrics show how compelling your content is. We track average time on page, pages per session, bounce rate, scroll depth, and interaction rate. Longer dwell times generally indicate more engaging content, though context matters—a support page with a very short dwell time might actually indicate that users quickly found the information they needed.
Conversion lift is perhaps the most direct measure of UX impact—the change in conversion rates after UX improvements. This could be e‑commerce purchases, lead form submissions, newsletter sign‑ups, account creations, or content downloads. One Michigan client saw their lead generation increase by 215% after a comprehensive UX redesign—a clear demonstration of the business impact of good UX.
We create dedicated UX analytics dashboards that bring key metrics together for ongoing monitoring. These typically include user flow visualizations, conversion funnels, behavior flows, goal completion rates, and session recordings of key user journeys. Having all this information in one place makes it easier to spot patterns and opportunities